SMAH915 - A Case Study of Bundaberg Hospital Assessment Answer

Introduction

The rigorous approach employed by healthcare organisations to ensure the delivery of safe, excellent, and effective patient care is known as clinical governance. A number of procedures, concepts, and strategies are used to monitor and enhance the standards of clinical practice, patient safety, and overall healthcare outcomes (Phillips et al., 2017). Clinical governance's primary goal within healthcare systems is to foster a culture of excellence, continuous improvement, accountability, and the greatest level of patient safety and care (Van Zwanenberg & Edwards, 2018).

The Bundaberg Hospital incident, a well-known example of healthcare failure in Queensland, Australia, as a result of a dearth of clinical governance and leadership failure, will be examined in this essay as an example of one such instance. The hospital experienced a number of problems that jeopardized the quality of patient care, including instances of incorrect diagnoses, surgical mistakes, and subpar care. The public's shock at learning about these shortcomings raised serious questions about the standard of patient care (Cleary & Duke, 2019). The unfortunate circumstances surrounding this case serve as a somber reminder of the crucial role strong clinical governance systems play in preserving patient safety, care quality, and overall excellence in healthcare. The essay also seeks to suggest a tactic that can be used to guarantee patient safety.

Analysis Using Components of Clinical Governance

Issue 1: Failure to Adhere to the Norms of Clinical Care

There were upsetting instances of clinical care at the Bundaberg Hospital event. The lack of commitment to evidence-based methods was highlighted by the documentation of misdiagnoses, surgical mistakes, and treatment delays (Murray et al., 2017). The idea of clinical effectiveness, which refers to the practice of making sure that healthcare interventions are founded on the best available evidence and produce the best possible patient outcomes, is at the core of clinical governance (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare, 2023). Clinical guidelines, protocols, and the most recent medical information should all be used as a basis for clinical judgments; in this instance, all of these factors were violated, adversely affecting the patients (Andersson et al., 2019).

Issue 2: Failure to Assure Patient Safety

At Bundaberg Hospital, systemic deficiencies in patient safety mechanisms came to light. Reports highlighted lapses in infection control, improper medication administration, and inadequate patient monitoring. These failures underscore the importance of implementing and adhering to stringent patient safety protocols (Barr, 2018). Patient safety stands as a cornerstone of healthcare excellence, encompassing strategies and practices designed to prevent harm to patients. The absence of such protocols led to tragic incidents of patient harm, some of which could have been averted with proper patient safety measures (Auraaen et al., 2020).

Issue 3: Inconvenience and Poor Patient Experience

Regrettably, at Bundaberg Hospital, patients and their families described unsatisfactory experiences characterised by inadequate communication, apathy from medical professionals, and a lack of empathy. This deficiency emphasised an apparent disconnect between the hospital's care delivery and the needs and expectations of its patients (Dijkstra et al., 2022). The importance of the patient experience in clinical governance may be seen in the dedication to delivering healthcare in a kind, considerate, and patient-centred way. A patient-centric approach fosters trust, engagement, and positive healthcare outcomes (Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care).

Issue 4: Failed leadership and Ineffective Management

In the Bundaberg Hospital incident, leadership failures were evident at various levels. The prevailing culture discouraged open reporting of concerns and stifled the flow of information necessary for effective patient care. Due to the lack of openness, patient safety was not given priority, which hampered accountability (Murray et al., 2018). Effective clinical governance requires strong leadership that fosters a culture of accountability, transparency, and patient-centeredness. Establishing a culture that supports patient well-being and upholds the highest standards of care depends on effective leadership (Northern Sydney Local Health District, 2017).

Issue 5: Inefficient Risk Management

At Bundaberg Hospital, risk management deficiencies were glaringly apparent. Crucial risks, including inadequate infection control measures and improper medication practices, were not adequately addressed (Cleary & Duke, 2019). A core tenet of clinical governance is risk management, encompassing the identification, assessment, and mitigation of potential risks to patient safety and care quality. Effective risk management strategies should have proactively identified these risks and implemented measures to minimise them, ultimately preventing patient harm (Government of Western Australia Department of Health, 2022).

Issue 6: Inadequate Education and Training

The Bundaberg incident revealed that education and training were insufficient. Healthcare professionals' ongoing development, training on evidence-based practices, and regular competency assessments are paramount to upholding high standards of care (Dijkstra et al., 2022). Education and training are integral to clinical governance, ensuring healthcare professionals possess the necessary knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective care. A continuous commitment to education ensures that healthcare providers remain well-equipped to deliver quality care that aligns with best practices (ACSQH, 2023).

Issue 6: Gaps in Interprofessional Communication

The Bundaberg Hospital incident underscored the detrimental effects of communication breakdowns. Inadequate communication within healthcare teams led to misunderstandings and errors that compromised patient care (Nowonty et al., 2018). Clear and effective communication is vital in clinical governance, facilitating coordinated care among healthcare teams and promoting informed decision-making for patients and their families. A robust communication framework encompassing interdisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement is essential for maintaining a culture of safety and quality (ACSQH, 2023).

Issue 7: Performance Management

Deficits in recognising and resolving performance concerns were glaring in the case of Bundaberg Hospital. (Carter et al., 2018) Performance management involves the systematic monitoring, evaluation, and improvement of healthcare professionals' performance to uphold care standards. Regular evaluations, prompt problem-solving, and support for ongoing improvement are all components of a strong performance management system. Patient safety is put at risk by failing to implement appropriate performance management (ACSQH, 2023).

Strategy For Patient Safety Using Clinical Governance

The analysis of the Bundaberg Hospital incident, within the framework of clinical governance components, underscores the urgent need for a comprehensive strategy to enhance patient safety and overall healthcare quality. By encouraging a culture of security, openness, and ongoing improvement, this suggested solution aims to solve the flaws and weaknesses that have been found. Healthcare organisations can create a path to patient care excellence by integrating this strategy with the knowledge gained through healthcare failure.

Leadership and Culture Transformation

The Bundaberg Hospital incident underscored the significance of leadership and organisational culture in patient safety. A lack of effective leadership and a culture that did not prioritise patient safety were identified as contributing factors. Research by  (Heinen et al. (2019) highlights that leadership commitment is crucial in establishing a culture of safety and patient-centred care. Selecting executives who prioritise patient safety and care quality and encouraging open communication and accountability aligns with best practices to prevent similar incidents.

Robust Clinical Education and Training

Inadequate training and education of healthcare professionals were identified in the Bundaberg incident. Research by Gullick et al. (2019) emphasises that comprehensive training programs are essential to ensure consistent quality care. Standardising training across departments and roles, as suggested by Lawn et al.(2017), could have addressed gaps in care quality observed at Bundaberg Hospital. Ongoing professional development, aligned with the latest medical research and techniques, as recommended by Halcomb et al.(2020), would have contributed to preventing errors.

Strengthening Patient Safety Protocols

The Bundaberg Hospital incident brought to light deficiencies in patient safety protocols. Effective patient safety protocols are essential to prevent adverse events. The World Health Organization (WHO) stresses evidence-based protocols to enhance patient safety (WHO, 2017). Collaborating among stakeholders, including clinicians and administrators, to evaluate and update protocols aligns with the best practices advocated by  Robinson (2017) and would have been instrumental in preventing similar errors.

Effective Risk Management

The incident highlighted a lack of effective risk management practices. Research by emphasises the role of risk management in identifying vulnerabilities and improving patient safety. Establishing a dedicated risk management team, as recommended by WHO (2018), would have helped identify and address potential issues. Regular analysis of near-misses and adverse events, in alignment with best practices to learn from mistakes, could have mitigated risks and improved patient safety (Martinez et al., 2017).

Transparent Communication Channels

The Bundaberg incident revealed the adverse effects of poor communication among healthcare teams. Trevena et al.(2017) emphasize the importance of clear communication to prevent medical errors. Transparent communication channels and interdisciplinary collaboration, in line with recommendations by Hyland-Wood et al. (2021), are crucial to effective care coordination and preventing misunderstandings that can lead to errors.

Performance Management and Accountability

Issues with healthcare professionals' performance were evident in the Bundaberg incident. Strengthening performance management processes aligns with WHO’s (2018) emphasis on timely feedback and evaluations. Holding individuals accountable and addressing concerns promptly, as suggested by Flottorp et al. (2018), ensures consistent, high-quality care and could have prevented errors observed at Bundaberg Hospital.

Embracing Technology and Data Analysis

The incident at Bundaberg Hospital highlighted errors related to record-keeping and medication administration. Integrating technology solutions, such as electronic health records, as supported by Tubaishat (2019), could have minimised these errors. Utilising data analysis to identify trends and areas of concern, aligned with research by (Dixit & Sambasivan (2018), would have proactively addressed risks and improved patient safety.

Continuous Improvement and Learning Culture

The incident emphasised the need for continuous improvement and a learning culture. (Zuber & Moody ( 2018) stress the value of organisational learning in preventing errors. Encouraging staff to identify areas for enhancement and conducting root cause analyses of adverse events, along with sharing lessons learned across the organisation, as recommended by Lawn et al. (2017), would have cultivated a culture of transparency and improvement.

Conclusion

The Bundaberg Hospital incident serves as a stark reminder of the dire consequences that can arise from inadequate clinical governance. This case underscores the vital role of clinical governance in ensuring patient safety, care quality, and overall healthcare excellence. By dissecting the incident through clinical governance's components, we uncover numerous systemic failures. Clinical effectiveness was compromised, evident through misdiagnoses and treatment delays. Patient safety mechanisms faltered, with lapses in infection control and medication administration. Patient experience suffered due to inadequate communication and empathy.

Leadership failures stifled transparency and accountability, and risk management deficiencies allowed preventable risks to persist. Inadequate education and training further compounded the issues. A strategic response is imperative. Strong leadership and a safety-focused culture must be cultivated. Robust clinical education and training programs are essential. Patient safety protocols need strengthening, technology integration, and transparent risk communication. Learning from the past, a culture of continuous improvement should be fostered. These efforts collectively can reshape healthcare organisations, fostering patient safety, care quality, and unwavering commitment to excellence.

References

Andersson, U., Maurin Söderholm, H., Wireklint Sundström, B., Andersson Hagiwara, M., & Andersson, H. (2019). Clinical reasoning in the emergency medical services: An integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 27, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0646-y

Auraaen, A., Saar, K., & Klazinga, N. (2020). System governance towards improved patient safety: Key functions, approaches and pathways to implementation. https://doi.org/10.1787/18152015

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. (2023). Clinical performance and effectiveness. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards/clinical-governance-standard/clinical-performance-and-effectiveness

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. (2023). Communicating with patients and colleagues. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/communicating-safety/communicating-patients-and-colleagues

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. (2023). National Model Clinical Governance Framework. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/clinical-governance/national-model-clinical-governance-framework

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. (2023). Clinical practice guidelines (Guidelines). https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/qupp-review~qupp-clinical-practice-guidelines

Barr, N. (2018). Challenges for infection prevention and control in paramedic-led healthcare: Self-reported behaviours and perceptions of Australian paramedics (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Sunshine Coast).  https://ap-st01.ext.exlibrisgroup.com/61USC_INST/upload/1692446225842/PDF%20-%20Thesis.pdf

Carter, D. J., Street, D. J., & Bush, S. (2018). Building public confidence in medical registration revalidation: Reform of medical registration law in Australia, a new risk-based approach. Journal of Law and Medicine. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/126457

Cleary, S., & Duke, M. (2019). Clinical governance breakdown: Australian cases of wilful blindness and whistleblowing. Nursing Ethics, 26(4), 1039-1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017731917

Dijkstra, R. I., Roodbeen, R. T., Bouwman, R. J., Pemberton, A., & Friele, R. (2022). Patients at the centre after a health care incident: A scoping review of hospital strategies targeting communication and nonmaterial restoration. Health Expectations, 25(1), 264-275.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13376

Dixit, S. K., & Sambasivan, M. (2018). A review of the Australian healthcare system: A policy perspective. SAGE Open Medicine, 6, 2050312118769211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118769211

Government of Western Australia Department of Health. (2022). Clinical risk management. https://www.health.wa.gov.au/articles/a_e/clinical-risk-management

Gullick, J., Lin, F., Massey, D., Wilson, L., Greenwood, M., Skylas, K., & Gill, F. J. (2019). Structures, processes and outcomes of specialist critical care nurse education: An integrative review. Australian Critical Care, 32(4), 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2018.09.007

Halcomb, E., McInnes, S., Williams, A., Ashley, C., James, S., Fernandez, R., & Calma, K. (2020). The experiences of primary healthcare nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Australia. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(5), 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12589

Heinen, M., van Oostveen, C., Peters, J., Vermeulen, H., & Huis, A. (2019). An integrative review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(11), 2378-2392.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14092

Hyland-Wood, B., Gardner, J., Leask, J., & Ecker, U. K. (2021). Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w

Lawn, S., Zhi, X., & Morello, A. (2017). An integrative review of e-learning in the delivery of self-management support training for health professionals. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1022-0

Murray, M., Sundin, D., & Cope, V. (2018). New graduate registered nurses’ knowledge of patient safety and practice: A literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(1-2), 31-47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13785

Martinez, W., Lehmann, L. S., Hu, Y. Y., Desai, S. P., & Shapiro, J. (2017). Processes for identifying and reviewing adverse events and near misses at an academic medical center. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 43(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.11.001

Northern Sydney Local Health District. (2017). Clinical Governance Framework. https://www.nslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/AboutUs/Documents/NSLHDClinicalGovernanceFramework2022-2025.pdf

Nowotny, B. M., Loh, E., Lorenz, K., & Wallace, E. M. (2018). Sharing the pain: lessons from missed opportunities for healthcare improvement from patient complaints and litigation in the Australian health system. Australian Health Review, 43(4), 382-391.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17266

Phillips, C., Hall, S., Pearce, C., Travaglia, J., de Lusignan, S., Love, T., & Kijakovic, M. (2017). Improving quality through clinical governance in primary health care. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/119232

Robinson, K. M. (2017). The dynamics of health information management in Australia: The emergence and shaping of a profession (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania). https://doi.org/10.25959/23238659.v1

Trevena, L., Shepherd, H. L., Bonner, C., Jansen, J., Cust, A. E., Leask, J., & Hoffmann, T. (2017). Shared decision making in Australia in 2017. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 123, 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.011

Tubaishat, A. (2019). The effect of electronic health records on patient safety: A qualitative exploratory study. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 44(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2017.1398753

Van Zwanenberg, T., & Edwards, C. (2018). Clinical governance in primary care. In Clinical Governance in Primary Care (pp. 17-30). CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781315375687-2/clinical-governance-primary-care-tim-van-zwanenberg-christina-edwards

World Health Organization. (2017). WHO guidelines on ethical issues in public health surveillance. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255721/9789241512657-chi.pdf

World Health Organization. (2018). Accelerating Health-Care Quality and Safety Improvement in Transitional Economy Member States: Collaborative Workshop 1, Melbourne, Australia, 12-14 September 2018: Meeting report. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/279418/RS-2018-GE-47-AUS-eng.pdf

Zuber, C. D., & Moody, L. (2018). Creativity and innovation in health care. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000267

You Might Also Like :- 

Medical Science Assignment Help

Hospital in The Home Impact on Antibiotic Utilization and Patient Outcomes

Design and Implement A Database for Felicity Stillwell Hospital