LSD403: Sample Assessment Life Stages and Development

Introduction

Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, a foundational concept in developmental psychology, reveals the intricate interplay of environmental influences on human development. This assessment examines its pros, cons, and applications in Australia's social programs. It also analyses challenges faced by early adults and highlights my key learnings from the lifespan development course.

Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory

The Ecological Systems Theory, a well-known developmental psychology framework developed by Uri Bronfenbrenner, has had a profound effect on our knowledge of psychology and human development. The microsystem, the mesosystem, the exosystem, the macrosystem, and the chronosystem are some of the five systems that Bronfenbrenner used to categorise an individual's surroundings. The bioecological model, as this theory is often known, offers a thorough and all-encompassing view of how numerous environmental systems interact and affect a person's growth and development (Evans, 2020).
Read Also: Ecology Assignment Help

Pros of Ecological Systems Theory:

The breadth of Bronfenbrenner's philosophy is one of its key advantages. It acknowledges that multiple tiers of environmental systems have an impact on human development and are in addition to individual features or genetics (Hertler, 2018). This encompasses the macrosystem (societal values) and the microsystems (immediate environment), as well as the mesosystem (connections between microsystems) and exosystem (indirect impacts). The intricate nature of human development can be considered by academics and practitioners thanks to this multi-level approach (Skinner, 2022). The theory emphasises how crucial context is to comprehending human growth. It emphasises how people are immersed in a variety of systems that have an impact on their development rather than existing in isolation.

According to Ahmed Shafi and Templeton (2020), this point of view is useful for comprehending how an individual's cultural, societal, and family environments influence their development. Furthermore, Bronfenbrenner's approach acknowledges that growth is dynamic and ongoing. It recognises that environmental and human changes can result from people's ongoing interactions with their environments. Understanding how people adapt and grow requires this dynamic perspective (Tudge et al., 2023). The development of solutions and policies that benefit people has been significantly influenced by the ecological systems theory. By emphasising the significance of many environmental systems, policymakers are urged to take the bigger picture into account when creating programs and services (Eriksson et al., 2018).

Cons of Ecological Systems Theory:

One of the drawbacks of the ecological systems theory is how complex it is. Although its intricate framework is useful in reflecting the subtleties of human development, it could be challenging to put into reality. Establishing precise and useful intervention approaches might be difficult since it can be daunting to understand and analyse how various systems interact (Merçon-Vargas et al., 2020). The idea is commonly criticised for not being detailed enough in identifying the specific mechanisms through which environmental systems influence development. Although it provides a framework for understanding these influences, the specific processes at work must also be fully justified. This may reduce the effectiveness of it in directing specific therapies (Hayes et al., 2022). Some critics claim that the ecological systems theory overemphasises the environment and undervalues the influence of genetics and personal traits on human development. Although these characteristics are acknowledged, it may be necessary to give them more weight in order to explain individual variances in developmental trajectory (Elliott & Davis, 2020).
Read Also: Environmental Studies Assignment Help Sample Online

Application in Australia's Social Learning Projects

Multiple social learning programs and initiatives to advance child development, education, and well-being in Australia have been supported by Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory. Early childhood education programs in Australia frequently draw on the ecological systems theory. Education professionals and decision-makers know that a child's development is influenced by various systems, including the home, school, and community. According to McKinlay et al. (2018), Australia's National Quality Framework (NQF) for Early Childhood Education and Care, which is based on Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory, emphasises the value of taking into account all of the systems that have an impact on a child's development. In Australia, social learning initiatives frequently centre on empowering and developing local communities.

By recognising the significance of community-level elements (exosystem) and their effect on individual well-being, Bronfenbrenner's theory promotes a holistic approach to community development (Heard et al., 2023). When developing social integration and well-being interventions, for example, initiatives like the Stronger Communities Programme take the larger community context into account (Australian Government, 2023).

Indigenous communities and Australia's diverse culture offer special opportunities and challenges for social learning programs. The focus on context that the ecological systems theory places here is particularly pertinent. It aids practitioners in understanding the social, cultural, historical, and socioeconomic elements that influence how people develop within these communities, resulting in interventions that are more culturally sensitive and successful (Usher et al., 2021). Research conducted by organisations like the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) acknowledges the importance of cultural and historical context in Indigenous communities (Duker et al., 2021). The ecological systems theory has influenced the development of policies related to child welfare, education, and family support policies in Australia. Policymakers consider the theory's framework when designing programs that aim to improve outcomes for children and families. Policies and programs such as "The Australian Early Development Census" (AEDC) and "Closing the Gap" initiatives explicitly consider the impact of various environmental systems on child development and well-being (Villanueva et al., 2022).

Challenges faced by early adults (Age group 35 years) through Bronfenbrenner's lens

Individuals in the adult age group, typically around 35 years old, face many developmental challenges that can be analysed through the lens of Uri Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory. Within the microsystem, career-related pressures loom large. At this age, individuals often strive for career stability and advancement while navigating the delicate balance between work and personal life. According to a study by Obrenovic et al. (2020), work-family conflict is a prevalent issue affecting individual well-being and family dynamics. Moreover, the demands of starting families or raising young children complicate the microsystem. Adjusting to new roles as parents and managing family dynamics can be potentially challenging. For instance, a study by Lo et al. (2023) highlights the stressors associated with early parenthood, emphasising the need for social support and parenting resources.

Moving to the mesosystem, the interaction between the work and family domains is a pivotal concern. Balancing the demands of a career with family responsibilities can lead to work-family conflict (Sheikh et al., 2018). An integrative review by Sirgy and Lee (2018) highlights that effective support mechanisms, such as flexible working hours and parental leave policies, can significantly impact an individual's ability to navigate this challenge. Furthermore, the quality of social support networks, an essential component of the mesosystem, plays a crucial role in coping with life's challenges. Maintaining friendships and extended family connections can improve emotional well-being (Bean et al., 2019).

In the exosystem, economic stability takes centre stage. Factors like job security, income, and access to affordable housing directly impact individuals in their mid-thirties. Economic instability or inequality can lead to stress and affect overall well-being (Rolfe et al., 2020). Additionally, government policies related to healthcare, education, and social services can substantially affect an individual's life at this age. Access to quality healthcare and affordable education, shaped by government policies, can mitigate developmental challenges (Kruk et al., 2018). In the macrosystem, societal expectations and cultural values come into play.

Societal norms regarding marriage, career achievements, and family planning can create pressure for individuals in this age group (Thébaud & Halcomb, 2019). Balancing personal aspirations with these expectations can be challenging. Furthermore, cultural factors, such as attitudes toward gender roles, influence the division of labour within families and workplaces (Lomazzi et al., 2018). Research by Hao et al. (2020) highlights the complex interplay between cultural expectations and gender roles, impacting individuals' experiences in both work and family domains.

Navigating through the challenges

First and foremost, I place a strong emphasis on prioritising work-life balance. This means consciously setting boundaries between my professional and personal life. I recognise the importance of only allowing work to consume some of my time and energy. I make use of flexible work choices, such as remote work possibilities or flexible hours, wherever I can to strike this balance. I sincerely believe spending quality time with my loved ones is necessary to sustain happy relationships and promote personal well-being. I make an effort to prevent work from taking priority over other elements of my life by scheduling time for leisure, interests, and downtime. I also recognise the value of creating a strong network of allies. I put time and effort into sustaining my ties with friends and family. These relationships offer a sense of emotional security and community. Additionally, I actively look for communities and support groups that share my passions and values. I may exchange experiences, get advice, and help others going through similar difficulties by being a part of such communities. These relationships are essential for resilience and personal development.

In addition, prioritising my health and well-being is crucial to my overall well-being. My program includes frequent physical activity, a nutritious diet, and, when required, consulting a doctor. I am aware of the connection between my mental and physical well-being and the benefit of taking care of myself to manage life's obstacles better. Finally, I support the notion of adjusting to evolving norms. I understand that societal norms and expectations are not static and evolve. I remain open-minded and flexible in my approach to personal choices. Whether it involves redefining traditional gender roles, embracing new family structures, or adapting to shifting cultural values, I strive to align my decisions with my evolving values and goals.

Learnings from the course and contributions

Throughout my journey in this lifespan development course, I have gained profound insights into the intricate domain of human behaviour and growth, all of which resonate in many psychological theories. One of my most striking revelations was the importance of comprehending and applying various developmental theories across different life stages. For instance, understanding Jean Piaget's seminal theory of cognitive development was an exciting experience. It sheds light on the remarkable evolution of our thought processes from the initial stages of infancy to the development of intellectual abilities in adulthood (Bhetuwal, 2022). Realising that our capacity for reasoning, problem-solving, and critical thinking undergo substantial metamorphosis throughout our lives was, in essence, a revelation. It underscored the inherent interrelatedness of our cognitive abilities, reminding me that growth is a constant phenomenon of life.
Read Also: NRS83002 Mental Health Across The Lifespan Assessment Answer

Erik Erikson's psychosocial stages, another cornerstone of this course, provided a rich framework for understanding the emotional and social challenges that are a part of our existence. The profound impact of these stages, from the identity crises of adolescence to the quest for generativity in middle and late adulthood, through a complex path of development that we all partake in (Orenstein & Lewis, 2022). The notion of identity formation, in particular, resonated with me, as it encapsulated the ever-evolving nature of our self-concept and the quest for a sense of purpose that extends well beyond youth. The concept of multidimensional development was yet another enlightening facet of this course, aligning seamlessly with theories like Urie Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory. It underscored the profound influence of environmental factors in shaping our growth (Evans, 2020).

Recognising that our development is not solely determined by genetic inheritance but also intricately intertwined with the complex interplay of our surroundings, including cultural and socio-political context, was a paradigm shift in my understanding. It strengthened the fact that we are products of our environments, shaped by the broader societal forces that envelop us, from family dynamics to cultural norms and societal expectations. Lastly, the course deepened my awareness of the profound impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and the insights gleaned from developmental psychopathology theories. This highlighted the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity and the critical importance of early intervention and support in mitigating the long-term effects of such challenges.

Conclusion

Uri Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory offers a comprehensive perspective on human development, highlighting the intricate interplay of environmental systems. It is a valuable framework, guiding policies and social projects in Australia, but complexity and a lack of specific mechanisms are criticisms. Individuals in their mid-thirties face career pressures, work-family balance, economic stability, societal expectations, and cultural values, all shaping their development. Navigating these challenges involves setting boundaries, building support networks, prioritising self-care, and adapting to evolving norms. The course on lifespan development has illuminated the dynamic nature of human growth, emphasising the role of individual and environmental factors.

References

Ahmed Shafi, A., & Templeton, S. (2020). Towards a dynamic interactive model of resilience. Reconsidering resilience in education: An exploration using the dynamic interactive model of resilience, 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49236-6_2

Australian Governement. (2023). Stronger communities programme. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/territories-regions-cities

Bean, C. G., Pingel, R., Hallqvist, J., Berg, N., & Hammarström, A. (2019). Poor peer relations in adolescence, social support in early adulthood, and depressive symptoms in later adulthood—evaluating mediation and interaction using four-way decomposition analysis. Annals of Epidemiology, 29, 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.10.007

Bhetuwal, K. P. (2022). Critical Review of the Learning Theories of John Dewey and Jean Piaget. GSJ, 10(10). https://www.researchgate.net/profile.pdf

Duke, D. L., Prictor, M., Ekinci, E., Hachem, M., & Burchill, L. J. (2021). Culturally Adaptive Governance—Building a new framework for equity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research: Theoretical basis, ethics, attributes and evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7943.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157943

Elliott, S., & Davis, J. M. (2020). Challenging taken-for-granted ideas in early childhood education: A critique of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory in the age of post-humanism. Research handbook on childhoodnature: Assemblages of childhood and nature research, 1119-1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_60-1

Eriksson, M., Ghazinour, M., & Hammarström, A. (2018). Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice?. Social Theory & Health, 16, 414-433. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-0065-6

Evans, O. G. (2020). Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bronfenbrenner.html

Hayes, N., O'Toole, L., & Halpenny, A. M. (2022). Introducing Bronfenbrenner: A guide for practitioners and students in early years education. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.in/books

Heard, E., Bartleet, B. L., & Woolcock, G. (2023). Exploring the role of place‐based arts initiatives in addressing social inequity in Australia: A systematic review. Australian Journal of Social Issues.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.257

Hertler, S. C., Figueredo, A. J., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., Fernandes, H. B., Woodley of Menie, M. A., Hertler, S. C., & Woodley of Menie, M. A. (2018). Urie Bronfenbrenner: Toward an evolutionary ecological systems theory. Life History Evolution: A Biological Meta-Theory for the Social Sciences, 323-339.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90125-1_19

Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., Doubova, S. V., English, M., Elorrio, E. G., Guanais, F., Gureje, O., Hirschhorn, L. R., Jiang, L., Kelley, E., Lemango, E. T., Liljestrand, J., =Pate, M. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: Time for a revolution. The Lancet. Global Health, 6, e1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3

Lo, C. K., Chen, M., Chen, Q., Chan, K. L., & Ip, P. (2023). Social, Community, and Cultural Factors Associated with Parental Stress in Fathers and Mothers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021128

Lomazzi, V., Israel, S., & Crespi, I. (2018). Gender equality in Europe and the effect of work-family balance policies on gender-role attitudes. Social Sciences, 8(1), 5.  https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010005

McKinlay, S., Irvine, S., & Farrell, A. (2018). What keeps early childhood teachers working in long day care? Tackling the crisis for Australia's reform agenda in early childhood education and care. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 43(2), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.23965/AJEC.43.2.04

Merçon‐Vargas, E. A., Lima, R. F. F., Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2020). Processing proximal processes: What Bronfenbrenner meant, what he didn't mean, and what he should have meant. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(3), 321-334.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12373

Obrenovic, B., Jianguo, D., Khudaykulov, A., & Khan, M. A. S. (2020). Work-family conflict impact on psychological safety and psychological well-being: A job performance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00475

Orenstein, G. A., & Lewis, L. (2022). Eriksons stages of psychosocial development. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556096/

Rolfe, S., Garnham, L., Godwin, J., Anderson, I., Seaman, P., & Donaldson, C. (2020). Housing as a social determinant of health and wellbeing: Developing an empirically-informed realist theoretical framework. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09224-0

Sheikh, M. A., Ashiq, A., Mehar, M. R., Hasan, A., & Khalid, M. (2018). Impact of work and home demands on work life balance: Mediating role of work family conflicts. Pyrex Journal of Business and Finance Management Research, 4(5), 48-57. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/58045402

Sirgy, M. J., & Lee, D. J. (2018). Work-life balance: An integrative review. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13, 229-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9509-8

Skinner, E. A., Rickert, N. P., Vollet, J. W., & Kindermann, T. A. (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603

Thébaud, S., & Halcomb, L. (2019). One step forward? Advances and setbacks on the path toward gender equality in families and work. Sociology Compass, 13(6), e12700.  https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12700

Tudge, J. R., Merçon-Vargas, E. A., & Payir, A. (2022). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory: Its development, core concepts, and critical issues. In Sourcebook of family theories and methodologies: A dynamic approach (pp. 235-254). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92002-9_16

Usher, K., Jackson, D., Walker, R., Durkin, J., Smallwood, R., Robinson, M., & Marriott, R. (2021). Indigenous resilience in Australia: A scoping review using a reflective decolonizing collective dialogue. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 630601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.630601

Villanueva, K., Alderton, A., Higgs, C., Badland, H., & Goldfeld, S. (2022). Data to decisions: Methods to create neighbourhood built environment indicators relevant for early childhood development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095549

Zhao, K., Zhang, M., & Foley, S. (2019). Testing two mechanisms linking work-to-family conflict to individual consequences: do gender and gender role orientation make a difference?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(6), 988-1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1282534